FauxVkDB
English
Home / Adreno (TM) 830 / Compare

turnip_faux123_v1.2.1-rc4 vs turnip_faux123_v1.2.0

On Adreno (TM) 830 (AYN Odin 3). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.

Stockturnip_faux123_v1.2.0Mesa 26.3.0-devel (git-dd45fd0baa)
vs
Customturnip_faux123_v1.2.1-rc4Mesa 26.3.0-devel (git-dd45fd0baa)
Graphics system version (Vulkan)1.4.359 to 1.4.359
Optional features (extensions)172 to 172+0 -0
Features that pass their check (validated)66 to 704 pass only on turnip_faux123_v1.2.1-rc4 0 pass only on turnip_faux123_v1.2.0
Speed test scenes (benchmark)1 faster 0 slower 4 even2% faster overall (geometric mean)
Games each driver could run (an estimate from its feature list): green likely, yellow maybe, orange limited, red no
StockDX92002+DX102006+DX112009+DX122015+Switch
CustomDX92002+DX102006+DX112009+DX122015+Switch
  • compute_nbody_2x1% faster
  • hdr_2160p0% faster
  • oit_linked_lists1% slower
  • pipeline_barriers_2160p7% faster
  • subpasses_2160p2% faster

Custom driver against stock, per scene. Bars to the right are faster, to the left slower.

Not on equal terms: the GPU clock differed during 1 of these scenes (for example pipeline_barriers_2160p: stock at 88% of the device's maximum, custom at 98%). Part of the frame-time difference comes from the clock the device chose, not from the driver.

turnip_faux123_v1.2.0 details turnip_faux123_v1.2.1-rc4 details

Feature checks that differ (4)

Featureturnip_faux123_v1.2.0turnip_faux123_v1.2.1-rc4Change
perf.fb_local_barrier_large_draws
core
untestedpassgained
perf.fb_local_barrier_overdraw
core
untestedpassgained
stress.scratch_per_batch
core
untestedpassgained
stress.spill_helper_lanes
core
untestedpassgained

Speed test scenes (benchmark)

Sceneturnip_faux123_v1.2.0 msturnip_faux123_v1.2.1-rc4 msDifferenceStartsGPU clock, MHzPicture vs stock
compute_nbody2.80 typical 2.702.82 typical 2.70too light, see compute_nbody_2x3 of 3 vs 3 of 31100 vs 1100 no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
compute_nbody_2x8.42 typical 8.338.31 typical 8.221% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 31067 vs 1100 no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
hdr_2160p7.80 typical 7.877.79 typical 7.860% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 31058 vs 1100 no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
oit_linked_lists17.31 typical 17.3017.44 typical 17.431% slower3 of 3 vs 3 of 31100 vs 1100 no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
pipeline_barriers1.53 typical 1.421.56 typical 1.42too light, see pipeline_barriers_2160p3 of 3 vs 3 of 31100 vs 1100 no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
pipeline_barriers_2160p5.97 typical 5.575.60 typical 5.217% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 3967 vs 1083 not comparableno large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
subpasses2.46 typical 2.292.50 typical 2.30too light, see subpasses_2160p3 of 3 vs 3 of 31100 vs 1100 not checked
subpasses_2160p9.37 typical 9.579.18 typical 8.952% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 31061 vs 1100 not checked

Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe turnip_faux123_v1.2.1-rc4 against turnip_faux123_v1.2.0. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.

Technical differences (Vulkan)

Extensions only in turnip_faux123_v1.2.1-rc4 (0)
  • None
Extensions only in turnip_faux123_v1.2.0 (0)
  • None
Core features that differ (0)
None
Limits that differ (0)
Limitturnip_faux123_v1.2.0turnip_faux123_v1.2.1-rc4
Formats supported by only one driver (0 gained, 0 lost)

Only in turnip_faux123_v1.2.1-rc4:

  • None

Only in turnip_faux123_v1.2.0:

  • None