Home / Adreno (TM) 830 / Compare

Turnip-v26.3.0-20261012-A8xx vs Turnip_Faux123_v1.2.0

On Adreno (TM) 830 (AYANEO Pocket FIT Elite, HONOR AAK-AN00, HONOR Magic V5, nubia NX789J, OnePlus 13, OnePlus 13, OnePlus 13s, POCO F8 Pro, realme GT 7 Pro, Samsung Galaxy S25, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S25+, Xiaomi 15, Xiaomi 15, Xiaomi 15 Ultra, ZTE NP05J). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.

StockTurnip_Faux123_v1.2.0Mesa 26.3.0-devel (git-dd45fd0baa)

CustomTurnip-v26.3.0-20261012-A8xxMesa 26.3.0-devel (git-1f4952878d)

Graphics system version (Vulkan)1.4.359 to ?

Optional features (extensions)173 to ?not checked on both

Features that pass their check (validated)not tested on bothTurnip-v26.3.0-20261012-A8xx: no driver check yet

Speed test scenes (benchmark)0 faster 3 slower 2 even5% slower overall (geometric mean)

compute_nbody_2x15% slower
hdr_2160p0% slower
oit_linked_lists1% faster
pipeline_barriers_2160p5% slower
subpasses_2160p3% slower

Custom driver against stock, per scene. Bars to the right are faster, to the left slower.

Not on equal terms: the GPU clock differed during 5 of these scenes (for example compute_nbody_2x: stock at 60% of the device's maximum, custom at 44%). Part of the frame-time difference comes from the clock the device chose, not from the driver.

Turnip_Faux123_v1.2.0 details Turnip-v26.3.0-20261012-A8xx details

Feature checks that differ

Turnip-v26.3.0-20261012-A8xx: no driver check (validation report) yet. Both drivers need a driver check before their feature checks can be compared.

Speed test scenes (benchmark)

Scene	Turnip_Faux123_v1.2.0 ms	Turnip-v26.3.0-20261012-A8xx ms	Difference	Starts	GPU clock, MHz	Picture vs stock
compute_nbody	n/a	6.81	too light, see compute_nbody_2x	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	494 vs 525 not comparable	no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
compute_nbody_2x	18.78 typical 17.78	22.12 typical 21.98	15% slower	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	502 vs 525 not comparable	no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
hdr_2160p	16.13 typical 16.15	16.17 typical 16.64	0% slower	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	525 vs 525 not comparable	no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
oit_linked_lists	36.69 typical 36.45	36.47 typical 36.08	1% faster	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	474 vs 525 not comparable	no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
pipeline_barriers	3.30 typical 3.11	3.29 typical 3.02	too light, see pipeline_barriers_2160p	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	525 vs 525 not comparable	no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
pipeline_barriers_2160p	11.48 typical 10.70	12.04 typical 11.01	5% slower	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	525 vs 525 not comparable	no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
subpasses	5.25 typical 4.94	5.28 typical 4.89	too light, see subpasses_2160p	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	502 vs 525 not comparable	not checked
subpasses_2160p	19.06 typical 18.50	19.59 typical 20.45	3% slower	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	525 vs 525 not comparable	not checked

Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe Turnip-v26.3.0-20261012-A8xx against Turnip_Faux123_v1.2.0. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.

Technical differences (Vulkan)

Both drivers need a driver check (validation report) before their technical details (Vulkan) can be compared.