Home / Adreno (TM) 830 / Compare

Qualcomm_849_adpkg vs Turnip-v26.3.0-20261010-A8xx

On Adreno (TM) 830 (AYANEO Pocket FIT Elite, HONOR AAK-AN00, HONOR Magic V5, nubia NX789J, OnePlus 13, OnePlus 13, OnePlus 13s, POCO F8 Pro, realme GT 7 Pro, Samsung Galaxy S25, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S25+, Xiaomi 15, Xiaomi 15 Ultra, ZTE NP05J). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.

StockTurnip-v26.3.0-20261010-A8xxMesa 26.3.0-devel (git-bffd91947e)

CustomQualcomm_849_adpkgDriver Build: a2a1a29a71, Icb4aa5a425, 1758706229

Graphics system version (Vulkan)? to 1.4.295

Optional features (extensions)? to 177not checked on both

Features that pass their check (validated)not tested on bothTurnip-v26.3.0-20261010-A8xx: no driver check yet

Speed test scenes (benchmark)no shared scenes

Turnip-v26.3.0-20261010-A8xx details Qualcomm_849_adpkg details

Feature checks that differ

Turnip-v26.3.0-20261010-A8xx: no driver check (validation report) yet. Both drivers need a driver check before their feature checks can be compared.

Speed test scenes (benchmark)

The two drivers were not measured on the same set of device models. Frame times from different devices do not compare drivers, so read these numbers with that in mind.

Scene	Turnip-v26.3.0-20261010-A8xx ms	Qualcomm_849_adpkg ms	Difference	Starts	GPU clock, MHz	Picture vs stock
compute_nbody	10.38 typical 10.14	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs ?	373 vs ? clock unknown	not checked
hdr_2160p	16.60 typical 16.39	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs ?	900 vs ? clock unknown	not checked
oit_linked_lists	21.28 typical 20.92	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs ?	900 vs ? clock unknown	not checked
pipeline_barriers	1.70 typical 1.67	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs ?	900 vs ? clock unknown	not checked
pipeline_barriers_2160p	6.14 typical 6.00	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs ?	787 vs ? clock unknown	not checked
subpasses	2.78 typical 2.77	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs ?	900 vs ? clock unknown	not checked
subpasses_2160p	10.37 typical 10.37	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs ?	900 vs ? clock unknown	not checked

Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe Qualcomm_849_adpkg against Turnip-v26.3.0-20261010-A8xx. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.

Technical differences (Vulkan)

Both drivers need a driver check (validation report) before their technical details (Vulkan) can be compared.