FauxVkDB
English
Home / Mali-G77 / Compare

Mali-G77 MC9 vs Mali-G77 MC9

On Mali-G77 (Infinix GT 10 Pro, Redmi K40 Gaming, Redmi Note 10 Pro, Retroid Pocket 4 Pro, Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.

StockMali-G77 MC9v1.r32p1-01eac0.1ac506b46c382556d9568c04114e1009
vs
CustomMali-G77 MC9v1.r32p1-01eac0.efd03ef21f136842c0935bd4f493fe81
Graphics system version (Vulkan)1.1.177 to 1.1.177
Optional features (extensions)68 to 68+0 -0
Features that pass their check (validated)28 to 28both pass the same checks
Speed test scenes (benchmark)no shared scenes
Games each driver could run (an estimate from its feature list): green likely, yellow maybe, orange limited, red no
StockDX92002+DX102006+DX112009+DX122015+Switch
CustomDX92002+DX102006+DX112009+DX122015+Switch

Mali-G77 MC9 details Mali-G77 MC9 details

Feature checks that differ (0)

Every feature check ends the same way on both drivers.

Speed test scenes (benchmark)

The two drivers were not measured on the same set of device models. Frame times from different devices do not compare drivers, so read these numbers with that in mind.

SceneStock msMali-G77 MC9 msDifferenceStartsGPU clock, MHzPicture vs stock
compute_nbodyn/a22.12 typical 21.64only one side? vs 3 of 3? vs 620 clock unknownnot checked
hdr_2160pn/a41.42 typical 41.40only one side? vs ?? vs ? clock unknownnot checked
oit_linked_listsn/a23.59 typical 23.50only one side? vs 0 of 3? vs ? clock unknownnot checked
pipeline_barriersn/a8.83 typical 8.87only one side? vs 3 of 3? vs 802 clock unknownnot checked
subpassesn/a20.23 typical 20.24only one side? vs 3 of 3? vs 836 clock unknownnot checked

Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe Mali-G77 MC9 against Mali-G77 MC9. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.

Technical differences (Vulkan)

Extensions only in Mali-G77 MC9 (0)
  • None
Extensions only in Mali-G77 MC9 (0)
  • None
Core features that differ (0)
None
Limits that differ (0)
LimitStockMali-G77 MC9
Formats supported by only one driver (0 gained, 0 lost)

Only in Mali-G77 MC9:

  • None

Only in Mali-G77 MC9:

  • None