Home / Adreno (TM) 830 / Compare

turnip_faux123_v1.1.9-rc14 vs Turnip_MTR_v1.5_A8XX

On Adreno (TM) 830 (AYN Odin 3). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.

StockTurnip_MTR_v1.5_A8XXMesa 26.1.0-devel-lto (git-efb5ab1e4b)

Customturnip_faux123_v1.1.9-rc14Mesa 26.3.0-devel (git-dd45fd0baa)

Graphics system version (Vulkan)? to 1.4.359

Optional features (extensions)? to 172not checked on both

Features that pass their check (validated)not tested on bothTurnip_MTR_v1.5_A8XX: no driver check yet

Speed test scenes (benchmark)2 faster 1 slower 1 even6% faster overall (geometric mean)

hdr_2160p14% slower
oit_linked_lists1% slower
pipeline_barriers_2160p23% faster
subpasses_2160p20% faster

Custom driver against stock, per scene. Bars to the right are faster, to the left slower.

Small areas of the picture differ from the stock driver in 2 scenes (pipeline_barriers: 1632 of 2304 cells, pipeline_barriers_2160p: 311 of 2304 cells). The picture matches overall, so this is a local rendering fault, not a different scene.

Did not start every time: compute_nbody (stock 0 of 3, custom 3 of 3).

Not on equal terms: the GPU clock differed during 3 of these scenes (for example hdr_2160p: stock at 100% of the device's maximum, custom at 83%). Part of the frame-time difference comes from the clock the device chose, not from the driver.

Turnip_MTR_v1.5_A8XX details turnip_faux123_v1.1.9-rc14 details

Feature checks that differ

Turnip_MTR_v1.5_A8XX: no driver check (validation report) yet. Both drivers need a driver check before their feature checks can be compared.

Speed test scenes (benchmark)

Scene	Turnip_MTR_v1.5_A8XX ms	turnip_faux123_v1.1.9-rc14 ms	Difference	Starts	GPU clock, MHz	Picture vs stock
compute_nbody	n/a	n/a	only one side	0 of 3 vs 3 of 3	? vs 1100 clock unknown	not checked
compute_nbody_2x	n/a	10.82 typical 10.79	only one side	? vs 3 of 3	? vs 1100 clock unknown	not checked
hdr_2160p	14.89 typical 14.96	17.25 typical 17.42	14% slower	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	1100 vs 911 not comparable	no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
oit_linked_lists	17.26 typical 17.27	17.46 typical 17.45	1% slower	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	1100 vs 1100	no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
pipeline_barriers	1.90	n/a	too light, see pipeline_barriers_2160p	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	1100 vs 1100	no large difference 10.7 differs in 1632 small areas worst 83.7 64x36
pipeline_barriers_2160p	7.33 typical 6.86	5.96 typical 5.58	23% faster	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	1092 vs 995 not comparable	no large difference 0.9 differs in 311 small areas worst 47.3 64x36
subpasses	3.12 typical 3.01	2.52 typical 2.30	too light, see subpasses_2160p	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	1100 vs 1100	not checked
subpasses_2160p	11.58 typical 11.16	9.68 typical 9.65	20% faster	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	1100 vs 1036 not comparable	not checked

Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe turnip_faux123_v1.1.9-rc14 against Turnip_MTR_v1.5_A8XX. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.

Technical differences (Vulkan)

Both drivers need a driver check (validation report) before their technical details (Vulkan) can be compared.