FauxVkDB
English
Home / Adreno (TM) 830 / Compare

WN-Turnip-1.19-b_Axxx vs v37_Turnip_Gen8_V37_patch

On Adreno (TM) 830 (AYN Odin 3). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.

Stockv37_Turnip_Gen8_V37_patchMesa 26.3.0-devel (git-aa35464ee5)
vs
CustomWN-Turnip-1.19-b_AxxxMesa 26.3.0-devel (git-30da39187d)
Graphics system version (Vulkan)? to ?
Optional features (extensions)? to ?not checked on both
Features that pass their check (validated)not tested on bothv37_Turnip_Gen8_V37_patch and WN-Turnip-1.19-b_Axxx: no driver check yet
Speed test scenes (benchmark)0 faster 2 slower 2 even2% slower overall (geometric mean)
  • hdr_2160p6% slower
  • oit_linked_lists5% slower
  • pipeline_barriers_2160p2% faster
  • subpasses_2160p2% faster

Custom driver against stock, per scene. Bars to the right are faster, to the left slower.

v37_Turnip_Gen8_V37_patch details WN-Turnip-1.19-b_Axxx details

Feature checks that differ

v37_Turnip_Gen8_V37_patch and WN-Turnip-1.19-b_Axxx: no driver check (validation report) yet. Both drivers need a driver check before their feature checks can be compared.

Speed test scenes (benchmark)

Scenev37_Turnip_Gen8_V37_patch msWN-Turnip-1.19-b_Axxx msDifferenceStartsGPU clock, MHzPicture vs stock
hdr_2160p12.11 typical 12.0812.88 typical 12.836% slower3 of 3 vs 3 of 31100 vs 1100 no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
oit_linked_lists16.50 typical 16.5017.44 typical 17.435% slower3 of 3 vs 3 of 31100 vs 1100 no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
pipeline_barriers1.33 typical 1.322.77 typical 2.15too light, see pipeline_barriers_2160p3 of 3 vs 3 of 31083 vs 660 not comparableno large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
pipeline_barriers_2160p4.96 typical 4.934.86 typical 4.852% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 31050 vs 1075 no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
subpasses2.19 typical 2.193.07 typical 2.71too light, see subpasses_2160p3 of 3 vs 3 of 31100 vs 964 not comparablenot checked
subpasses_2160p8.32 typical 8.258.19 typical 8.182% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 31083 vs 1100 not checked

Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe WN-Turnip-1.19-b_Axxx against v37_Turnip_Gen8_V37_patch. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.

Technical differences (Vulkan)

Both drivers need a driver check (validation report) before their technical details (Vulkan) can be compared.