FauxVkDB
English
Home / Adreno (TM) 740 / Compare

Turnip-v26.3.0-20261008-r2-8G2-OneUI vs Turnip_v26.0.0_R1

On Adreno (TM) 740 (AYN Odin2, AYN Odin2 Portal, AYN Thor, Moorechip Retroid Pocket Nova, motorola edge plus 2023, OnePlus 11 5G, POCO F6 Pro, Samsung Galaxy S23, Samsung Galaxy S23, Samsung Galaxy S23, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23+, Sony Xperia 1 V, Xiaomi 13 pro). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.

StockTurnip_v26.0.0_R1Mesa 26.0.0-devel (git-cc1d942727)
vs
CustomTurnip-v26.3.0-20261008-r2-8G2-OneUIMesa 26.3.0-devel (git-d0e18ae81e)
Graphics system version (Vulkan)? to ?
Optional features (extensions)? to ?not checked on both
Features that pass their check (validated)not tested on bothTurnip_v26.0.0_R1 and Turnip-v26.3.0-20261008-r2-8G2-OneUI: no driver check yet
Speed test scenes (benchmark)2 faster 2 slower0% faster overall (geometric mean)
  • hdr_2160p16% slower
  • oit_linked_lists11% faster
  • pipeline_barriers_2160p3% slower
  • subpasses12% faster

Custom driver against stock, per scene. Bars to the right are faster, to the left slower.

Small areas of the picture differ from the stock driver in 1 scene (pipeline_barriers: 1761 of 2304 cells). The picture matches overall, so this is a local rendering fault, not a different scene.

Did not start every time: compute_nbody (stock 0 of 3, custom 3 of 3).

Not compared: 2 scenes with a paced frame rate (compute_nbody_2x, subpasses_2160p). At least one of the two drivers was held at a fixed frame rate there, so the two times do not measure the same thing.

Turnip_v26.0.0_R1 details Turnip-v26.3.0-20261008-r2-8G2-OneUI details

Feature checks that differ

Turnip_v26.0.0_R1 and Turnip-v26.3.0-20261008-r2-8G2-OneUI: no driver check (validation report) yet. Both drivers need a driver check before their feature checks can be compared.

Speed test scenes (benchmark)

The two drivers were not measured on the same set of device models. Frame times from different devices do not compare drivers, so read these numbers with that in mind.

SceneTurnip_v26.0.0_R1 msTurnip-v26.3.0-20261008-r2-8G2-OneUI msDifferenceStartsGPU clock, MHzPicture vs stock
compute_nbodyn/a5.91 typical 5.88only one side0 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs 693 clock unknownnot checked
compute_nbody_2xn/apaced at 15.81not compared? vs 3 of 3? vs 719 clock unknownnot checked
hdr_2160p30.28 typical 29.4236.06 typical 36.0416% slower3 of 3 vs 3 of 3615 vs 706 no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
oit_linked_lists29.39 typical 29.2826.50 typical 26.4511% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 3615 vs 719 no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
pipeline_barriers2.63 typical 2.552.35 typical 2.23too light, see pipeline_barriers_2160p3 of 3 vs 3 of 3615 vs 691 no large difference 10.5 differs in 1761 small areas worst 53.3 64x36
pipeline_barriers_2160p8.91 typical 8.829.17 typical 9.343% slower3 of 3 vs 3 of 3615 vs 719 no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
subpasses4.30 typical 4.243.82 typical 3.6812% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 3615 vs 719 not checked
subpasses_2160p16.00 typical 15.92paced at 15.77not compared3 of 3 vs 3 of 3570 vs 719 not comparablenot checked

Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe Turnip-v26.3.0-20261008-r2-8G2-OneUI against Turnip_v26.0.0_R1. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.

Technical differences (Vulkan)

Both drivers need a driver check (validation report) before their technical details (Vulkan) can be compared.