Home / Adreno (TM) 730 / Compare

turnip_faux123_v1.1.7 vs Qualcomm Technologies Inc. Adreno Vulkan Driver

On Adreno (TM) 730 (motorola edge 30 pro, Samsung Galaxy S22, Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy Tab S8). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.

StockQualcomm Technologies Inc. Adreno Vulkan DriverDriver Build: 0c393b63cf, I94e2bd5684, 1746191168

Customturnip_faux123_v1.1.7Mesa 26.3.0-devel (git-dd45fd0baa)

Graphics system version (Vulkan)1.1.128 to ?

Optional features (extensions)90 to ?not checked on both

Features that pass their check (validated)not tested on bothturnip_faux123_v1.1.7: no driver check yet

Speed test scenes (benchmark)no shared scenes

Qualcomm Technologies Inc. Adreno Vulkan Driver details turnip_faux123_v1.1.7 details

Feature checks that differ

turnip_faux123_v1.1.7: no driver check (validation report) yet. Both drivers need a driver check before their feature checks can be compared.

Speed test scenes (benchmark)

The two drivers were not measured on the same set of device models. Frame times from different devices do not compare drivers, so read these numbers with that in mind.

Scene	Stock ms	Custom ms	Difference	Starts	GPU clock, MHz	Picture vs stock
compute_nbody	8.84	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	753 vs 791	no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
hdr_2160p	42.84	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	734 vs 492	no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.3 64x36
oit_linked_lists	23.63	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	818 vs 818	no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
pipeline_barriers	6.06	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	734 vs 795	no large difference 6.6 differs in 1219 small areas worst 53.0 64x36
pipeline_barriers_2160p	n/a	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	818 vs 584 not comparable	no large difference 10.4 differs in 1483 small areas worst 62.7 64x36
subpasses	10.26	n/a	only one side	3 of 3 vs 3 of 3	791 vs 818	not checked
subpasses_2160p	n/a	n/a	only one side	? vs 3 of 3	? vs 814 clock unknown	not checked

Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe turnip_faux123_v1.1.7 against Qualcomm Technologies Inc. Adreno Vulkan Driver. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.

Technical differences (Vulkan)

Both drivers need a driver check (validation report) before their technical details (Vulkan) can be compared.