FauxVkDB
English
Home / Adreno (TM) 710 / Compare

v891.7 vs Turnip-v26.3.0-20261015-710-720-Test

On Adreno (TM) 710 (HONOR ALI-NX1, HONOR Pad 9, Motorola moto g stylus, Motorola moto g57 power, Motorola moto g75 5G, POCO X6 5G, POCO X6 5G). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.

StockTurnip-v26.3.0-20261015-710-720-TestMesa 26.3.0-devel (git-25219134d3)
vs
Customv891.7Driver Build: 0c393b63cf, I94e2bd5684, 1746191168
Graphics system version (Vulkan)? to ?
Optional features (extensions)? to ?not checked on both
Features that pass their check (validated)not tested on bothTurnip-v26.3.0-20261015-710-720-Test and v891.7: no driver check yet
Speed test scenes (benchmark)4 faster 0 slower56% faster overall (geometric mean)
  • compute_nbody14% faster
  • hdr_2160p112% faster
  • oit_linked_lists14% faster
  • subpasses117% faster

Custom driver against stock, per scene. Bars to the right are faster, to the left slower.

Small areas of the picture differ from the stock driver in 1 scene (pipeline_barriers: 1333 of 2304 cells). The picture matches overall, so this is a local rendering fault, not a different scene.

Turnip-v26.3.0-20261015-710-720-Test details v891.7 details

Feature checks that differ

Turnip-v26.3.0-20261015-710-720-Test and v891.7: no driver check (validation report) yet. Both drivers need a driver check before their feature checks can be compared.

Speed test scenes (benchmark)

SceneTurnip-v26.3.0-20261015-710-720-Test msv891.7 msDifferenceStartsGPU clock, MHzPicture vs stock
compute_nbody25.94 typical 26.1022.73 typical 22.6414% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs ? clock unknownno large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
hdr_2160p123.18 typical 123.7358.09 typical 58.00112% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs ? clock unknownno large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.3 64x36
oit_linked_lists40.89 typical 41.0335.95 typical 36.0114% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs ? clock unknownno large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
pipeline_barriersn/a19.41only one side3 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs ? clock unknownno large difference 7.0 differs in 1333 small areas worst 48.0 64x36
subpasses76.35 typical 15.9035.23 typical 35.23117% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs ? clock unknownnot checked

Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe v891.7 against Turnip-v26.3.0-20261015-710-720-Test. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.

Technical differences (Vulkan)

Both drivers need a driver check (validation report) before their technical details (Vulkan) can be compared.