v891.7 vs Turnip_v26.3.0-R6
On Adreno (TM) 710 (HONOR ALI-NX1, HONOR Pad 9, Motorola moto g stylus, Motorola moto g57 power, Motorola moto g75 5G, POCO X6 5G, POCO X6 5G). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.
StockTurnip_v26.3.0-R6Mesa 26.3.0-devel (git-a995eaeda4)
vsCustomv891.7Driver Build: 0c393b63cf, I94e2bd5684, 1746191168
Graphics system version (Vulkan)? to ?
Optional features (extensions)? to ?not checked on both
Features that pass their check (validated)not tested on bothTurnip_v26.3.0-R6 and v891.7: no driver check yet
Speed test scenes (benchmark)2 faster 0 slower56% faster overall (geometric mean)
- hdr_2160p110% faster
- oit_linked_lists15% faster
Custom driver against stock, per scene. Bars to the right are faster, to the left slower.
Small areas of the picture differ from the stock driver in 1 scene (pipeline_barriers: 1694 of 2304 cells). The picture matches overall, so this is a local rendering fault, not a different scene.
Did not start every time: compute_nbody (stock 0 of 3, custom 3 of 3).
Turnip_v26.3.0-R6 details v891.7 details
Feature checks that differ
Turnip_v26.3.0-R6 and v891.7: no driver check (validation report) yet. Both drivers need a driver check before their feature checks can be compared.
Speed test scenes (benchmark)
| Scene | Turnip_v26.3.0-R6 ms | v891.7 ms | Difference | Starts | GPU clock, MHz | Picture vs stock |
|---|
| compute_nbody | n/a | 22.73 typical 22.64 | only one side | 0 of 3 vs 3 of 3 | ? vs ? clock unknown | not checked |
| hdr_2160p | 122.16 typical 122.91 | 58.09 typical 58.00 | 110% faster | 3 of 3 vs 3 of 3 | ? vs ? clock unknown | no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.3 64x36 |
| oit_linked_lists | 41.36 typical 41.52 | 35.95 typical 36.01 | 15% faster | 3 of 3 vs 3 of 3 | ? vs ? clock unknown | no large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36 |
| pipeline_barriers | n/a | 19.41 | only one side | 3 of 3 vs 3 of 3 | ? vs ? clock unknown | no large difference 9.3 differs in 1694 small areas worst 47.3 64x36 |
| subpasses | n/a | 35.23 | only one side | 3 of 3 vs 3 of 3 | ? vs ? clock unknown | not checked |
Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe v891.7 against Turnip_v26.3.0-R6. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.
Technical differences (Vulkan)
Both drivers need a driver check (validation report) before their technical details (Vulkan) can be compared.