FauxVkDB
English
Home / Adreno (TM) 610 / Compare

Turnip-24.1.0.adpkg_R18.a6xx vs Qualcomm Technologies Inc. Adreno Vulkan Driver

On Adreno (TM) 610 (HONOR Pad X8a, HONOR X8c, POCO M7, Redmi Note 12, Redmi Note 13, Xiaomi 220333QAG). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.

StockQualcomm Technologies Inc. Adreno Vulkan DriverDriver Build: 43fc279f3a, I58833f8ed4, 1679659134
vs
CustomTurnip-24.1.0.adpkg_R18.a6xxMesa 24.1.0-devel (git-d17779430f)
Graphics system version (Vulkan)1.1.128 to ?
Optional features (extensions)54 to ?not checked on both
Features that pass their check (validated)not tested on bothTurnip-24.1.0.adpkg_R18.a6xx: no driver check yet
Speed test scenes (benchmark)2 faster 1 slower37% faster overall (geometric mean)
  • oit_linked_lists13% slower
  • pipeline_barriers69% faster
  • subpasses76% faster

Custom driver against stock, per scene. Bars to the right are faster, to the left slower.

Small areas of the picture differ from the stock driver in 1 scene (pipeline_barriers: 1510 of 2304 cells). The picture matches overall, so this is a local rendering fault, not a different scene.

Did not start every time: compute_nbody (stock 3 of 3, custom 0 of 3).

Qualcomm Technologies Inc. Adreno Vulkan Driver details Turnip-24.1.0.adpkg_R18.a6xx details

Feature checks that differ

Turnip-24.1.0.adpkg_R18.a6xx: no driver check (validation report) yet. Both drivers need a driver check before their feature checks can be compared.

Speed test scenes (benchmark)

SceneStock msCustom msDifferenceStartsGPU clock, MHzPicture vs stock
compute_nbody93.82 typical 94.02n/aonly one side3 of 3 vs 0 of 3? vs ? clock unknownnot checked
oit_linked_lists103.92 typical 103.83118.87 typical 118.1613% slower3 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs ? clock unknownno large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
pipeline_barriers83.44 typical 85.7149.45 typical 49.7269% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs ? clock unknownno large difference 9.1 differs in 1510 small areas worst 76.3 64x36
subpasses155.84 typical 155.8988.68 typical 88.5776% faster3 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs ? clock unknownnot checked

Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe Turnip-24.1.0.adpkg_R18.a6xx against Qualcomm Technologies Inc. Adreno Vulkan Driver. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.

Technical differences (Vulkan)

Both drivers need a driver check (validation report) before their technical details (Vulkan) can be compared.