Home / Samsung Xclipse 920 / Compare

radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-05b3092 vs radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-313870e

On Samsung Xclipse 920 (Samsung Galaxy S22, Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, Samsung Galaxy S24 FE). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.

Stockradv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-313870eMesa 26.3.0-devel (git-313870eb12)

Customradv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-05b3092Mesa 26.3.0-devel (git-05b3092fcc)

Graphics system version (Vulkan)1.4.358 to 1.4.358

Optional features (extensions)228 to 228+0 -0

Features that pass their check (validated)51 to 500 pass only on radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-05b3092 1 pass only on radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-313870e

Speed test scenes (benchmark)no shared scenes

Games each driver could run (an estimate from its feature list): green likely, yellow maybe, orange limited, red no

StockDX92002+DX102006+DX112009+DX122015+Switch

CustomDX92002+DX102006+DX112009+DX122015+Switch

radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-313870e details radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-05b3092 details

Feature checks that differ (1)

Feature	radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-313870e	radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-05b3092	Change
tessellationShader VkPhysicalDeviceFeatures	pass	fail	lost

Speed test scenes (benchmark)

The two drivers were not measured on the same set of device models. Frame times from different devices do not compare drivers, so read these numbers with that in mind.

Scene	radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-313870e ms	radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-05b3092 ms	Difference	Starts	GPU clock, MHz	Picture vs stock
compute_nbody	n/a	6.10 typical 6.04	only one side	? vs 3 of 3	? vs ? clock unknown	not checked
compute_nbody_2x	n/a	19.29 typical 18.44	only one side	? vs 3 of 3	? vs ? clock unknown	not checked
hdr_2160p	n/a	41.15 typical 39.15	only one side	? vs 3 of 3	? vs ? clock unknown	not checked
oit_linked_lists	n/a	7.45 typical 6.93	only one side	? vs 3 of 3	? vs ? clock unknown	not checked
pipeline_barriers	n/a	n/a	only one side	? vs 3 of 3	? vs ? clock unknown	not checked
pipeline_barriers_2160p	n/a	14.25 typical 15.04	only one side	? vs 3 of 3	? vs ? clock unknown	not checked
subpasses	n/a	n/a	only one side	? vs 3 of 3	? vs ? clock unknown	not checked
subpasses_2160p	n/a	n/a	only one side	? vs 3 of 3	? vs ? clock unknown	not checked

Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-05b3092 against radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-313870e. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.

Technical differences (Vulkan)

Extensions only in radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-05b3092 (0)

None

Extensions only in radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-313870e (0)

None

Core features that differ (0)

None

Limits that differ (0)

Limit	radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-313870e	radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-05b3092

Formats supported by only one driver (0 gained, 0 lost)

Only in radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-05b3092:

None

Only in radv-xclipse-26.3.0-devel-313870e:

None