FauxVkDB
English
Home / Mali-G720 MC7 / Compare

Mali-G720 MC7 vs Mali-G720 MC8

On Mali-G720 MC7 (POCO X7 Pro, POCO X8 Pro). The first driver named is compared against the second, which is the baseline.

StockMali-G720 MC8v1.r49p1-03bet0.4fc328bba6e40f10f4bc96d62f5ee40a
vs
CustomMali-G720 MC7v1.r49p1-03bet0.bedd3f0c1eaa833146818ccc820a3501
Graphics system version (Vulkan)1.3.278 to 1.3.278
Optional features (extensions)150 to 149+0 -1
Features that pass their check (validated)39 to 39both pass the same checks
Speed test scenes (benchmark)no shared scenes
Games each driver could run (an estimate from its feature list): green likely, yellow maybe, orange limited, red no
StockDX92002+DX102006+DX112009+DX122015+Switch
CustomDX92002+DX102006+DX112009+DX122015+Switch

Mali-G720 MC8 details Mali-G720 MC7 details

Feature checks that differ (0)

Every feature check ends the same way on both drivers.

Speed test scenes (benchmark)

The two drivers were not measured on the same set of device models. Frame times from different devices do not compare drivers, so read these numbers with that in mind.

SceneStock msMali-G720 MC7 msDifferenceStartsGPU clock, MHzPicture vs stock
compute_nbody13.79 typical 13.66n/aonly one side3 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs ? clock unknownno large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
hdr_2160p13.85 typical 13.66n/aonly one side3 of 3 vs ?? vs ? clock unknownnot checked
oit_linked_lists19.18 typical 18.71n/aonly one side3 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs ? clock unknownno large difference 0.0 no small difference worst 0.0 64x36
pipeline_barriersn/an/aonly one side3 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs ? clock unknownno large difference 8.0 differs in 1479 small areas worst 43.3 64x36
pipeline_barriers_2160p11.53 typical 11.52n/aonly one side3 of 3 vs ?? vs ? clock unknownnot checked
subpassesn/an/aonly one side3 of 3 vs 3 of 3? vs ? clock unknownnot checked
subpasses_2160p21.76 typical 21.78n/aonly one side3 of 3 vs ?? vs ? clock unknownnot checked

Time to draw one frame, per scene: the average (mean) frame time of the scene's best round, which is how many frames the driver delivered; lower is faster. "Typical" beside it is the median frame, which can sit well under the average when a driver's frames come in two speeds. A pair of reports made before per-round averages were recorded is compared on the median. A scene whose rounds disagree by more than 15% is left out. A scene marked "paced" was held at that mean frame time by the driver or the display queue, together with at least one other scene of the same run; its time says how the frames were spaced, not how fast the driver rendered, so it is not compared. A scene marked "too light" took under 8 ms at the standard size (1920 by 1080) on both drivers, where the screen's frame queue spaces the frames more than the chip does; its heavier run is the one compared: the row ending in _2160p is the scene drawn at 3840 by 2160, and compute_nbody_2x is that scene with twice the particles. "Faster" and "slower" describe Mali-G720 MC7 against Mali-G720 MC8. "Picture vs stock" compares one fixed frame per scene as a coarse colour grid (0 is identical, above 40 is a different picture); it finds a scene that was not drawn. Where both reports carry the finer 64x36 grid, the second figure is how many of its 2,304 cells differ by more than 4 of 255, and "worst" is the largest single cell; this is what finds a small rendering error in a picture that otherwise matches. A row marked 16x9 comes from a report made before the finer grid existed. "Starts" is how many of a scene's process starts reached a measured round. A GPU clock marked "not comparable" differed by more than 5% of the device's maximum between the two timings.

Technical differences (Vulkan)

Extensions only in Mali-G720 MC7 (0)
  • None
Extensions only in Mali-G720 MC8 (1)
  • VK_KHR_swapchain_mutable_format
Core features that differ (0)
None
Limits that differ (0)
LimitStockMali-G720 MC7
Formats supported by only one driver (0 gained, 0 lost)

Only in Mali-G720 MC7:

  • None

Only in Mali-G720 MC8:

  • None